Quantcast
Channel: Art History News
Viewing all 2913 articles
Browse latest View live

‘WHISTLER’S MOTHER’ ARRIVES JULY 4 AT THE CLARK ART INSTITUTE

$
0
0

Independence Day brings an American icon to the Clark Art Institute with the arrival of




Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 (Portrait of the Artist’s Mother) (1871) by James McNeill Whistler as part of the exhibition Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White, on view July 4 through September 27, 2015. Better known as Whistler’s Mother, the painting has been owned by the French state since 1891 and is in the collection of the Musée d’Orsay, Paris. It is one of the most renowned works of art by an American artist and is considered by many to be the most important American painting not held on American soil.

The painting serves as the centerpiece of an exhibition featuring a selection of Whistler’s prints and drawings, Japanese woodblock prints that inspired the artist, and ephemera that explore the image’s role in popular culture. The exhibition highlights works from the Lunder Collection of James McNeill Whistler at the Colby College Museum of Art as well as from the Clark’s permanent collection. The Clark is one of only two American venues featuring the painting this year and is the only east coast museum to show the iconic painting.

Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White is presented in collaboration with the Colby College Museum of Art and the Lunder Consortium for Whistler Studies. The painting has an interesting history of exhibition in the United States. In the 1930s The Museum of Modern Art, New York organized an eight-city tour to raise the spirits of Americans during the Depression. At the time, it was a great source of pride that a painting held in such regard by Europeans was painted by an American.



The Painting

Arrangement in Grey and BlackNo. 1 is considered the high point of Whistler’s career. Anna McNeill Whistler posed for the famous portrait in London in 1871 during a time she was living with her son. The artist exhibited the painting frequently in the decade following its creation. After his mother’s death and facing mounting financial pressures, Whistler sold the painting to the French state in 1891. In 1925 Whistler’s Mother became the first American painting to enter the collection of the Louvre and was moved to the collection of the Musée d’Orsay in 1986.

The painting depicts Anna Whistler dressed in black mourning garb and a white cotton cap, sitting in profile with a lace kerchief in her hands. Her feet rest on a small stool, and behind her is a framed print and a Japanese curtain.

The painting also contains a reference to the location in which it was executed. Whistler’s studio was located in the Chelsea area of London on the River Thames, and the artist was known to frequent the docks in search of views and subjects for portraits.  



Black Lion Wharf (1859), the framed print shown in the painting, depicts a scene typical of the type Whistler was creating at the time. The Clark’s exhibition features a print of Black Lion Wharf from the Colby College Museum of Art.

The Exhibition

In addition to Black Lion Wharf, the exhibition includes other depictions of Whistler’s surroundings on the River Thames such as  


Billingsgate (1859, Colby College Museum of Art)



and The Pool (1859, The Clark) all of which were later joined into a series known fittingly as The Thames Set and published the same year he created the portrait of his mother.

Another group of works, which grew out of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, were Whistler’s nocturnes. His frequent use of the terms “arrangement” and “nocturne” in the titles of his paintings reflects his interest in the musical notions of harmony and balance, characteristic of the aesthetic art movement.



 Nocturne Shipping (1879/1880)



 Nocturne: Furnace (1879/1880)

These works—represented in the exhibition by two etchings and one lithograph—began as depictions of the River Thames at night and continued during his time in Venice. As Whistler explained: “By using the word ‘nocturne’ I wished to indicate an artistic interest alone, divesting the picture of any outside anecdotal interest which might have been otherwise attached to it. A nocturne is an arrangement of line, form and colour first.” His desire to focus on form and color rather than narrative began with the groundbreaking portrait of his mother.

The composition of Whistler’s Mother reflects the artist’s interest in the Japanese woodblock prints he is known to have collected and admired, and the inclusion of a Japanese textile in the painting reinforces his keen interest in Japonisme. In late nineteenth-century London and Paris, Japanese woodblock prints were widely available and relatively affordable. Many artists of the time, including Whistler, Degas, Cassatt, Renoir, and Monet, were influenced by the Japanese aesthetic. Whistler, as evidenced in Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, not only owned Japanese textiles but also collected woodblock prints, including those by Utagawa Hiroshige I.

The exhibition presents a small selection of prints by Hiroshige alongside Whistler’s prints to reinforce their connection. For example, the radical cropping of space in



Whistler’s Rotherhithe (1860, Colby College Museum of Art)

is indebted to the similarly cropped interior/exterior in



Hiroshige’s View from Massaki of Suijin Shrine (1857, Rodbell Family Collection, The Clark).

While Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 is Whistler’s most famous painted portrait, he created hundreds of etchings, lithographic portraits, and drawings of his family, friends, and patrons throughout his life. The exhibition features the portraits  



Annie Haden (1860, Colby College Museum of Art)



and Mrs. Leyland, Sr. (1874–1875, Colby College Museum of Art)



and a drawing known as The Sleeper, a portrait of his model Joanna Hiffernan (1863, The Clark) from the artist’s early career when he chose close family and friends as his sitters.

A section of Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White explores the painting’s role in popular culture and collective American thought by presenting an array of historical and cultural replications and images such as magazine covers, posters, and photographs.




‘WHISTLER’S MOTHER’ ARRIVES JULY 4 AT THE CLARK ART INSTITUTE

For Immediate Release
May 14, 2015

Williamstown, Massachusetts—Independence Day brings an American icon to the Clark Art Institute with the arrival of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 (Portrait of the Artist’s Mother) (1871) by James McNeill Whistler as part of the exhibition Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White, on view July 4 through September 27, 2015. Better known as Whistler’s Mother, the painting has been owned by the French state since 1891 and is in the collection of the Musée d’Orsay, Paris. It is one of the most renowned works of art by an American artist and is considered by many to be the most important American painting not held on American soil.

The painting serves as the centerpiece of an exhibition featuring a selection of Whistler’s prints and drawings, Japanese woodblock prints that inspired the artist, and ephemera that explore the image’s role in popular culture. The exhibition highlights works from the Lunder Collection of James McNeill Whistler at the Colby College Museum of Art as well as from the Clark’s permanent collection. The Clark is one of only two American venues featuring the painting this year and is the only east coast museum to show the iconic painting.

Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White is presented in collaboration with the Colby College Museum of Art and the Lunder Consortium for Whistler Studies. The exhibition is generously supported by a grant from The Lunder Foundation and by Katherine and Frank Martucci.

The painting has an interesting history of exhibition in the United States. In the 1930s The Museum of Modern Art, New York organized an eight-city tour to raise the spirits of Americans during the Depression. At the time, it was a great source of pride that a painting held in such regard by Europeans was painted by an American.

“We look forward to welcoming this great American painting to the Berkshires,” said Michael Conforti, the Felda and Dena Hardymon Director of the Clark. “The Clark is indebted to the Musée d’Orsay for the loan of this extraordinary painting which will be the center of one of our summer 2015 exhibitions. The Clark has exceptional works by Winslow Homer and John Singer Sargent, but no major paintings by Whistler, another great American artist of the late nineteenth century. We are delighted to have the opportunity to present it at the Clark.”

The Painting

Arrangement in Grey and BlackNo. 1 is considered the high point of Whistler’s career. Anna McNeill Whistler posed for the famous portrait in London in 1871 during a time she was living with her son. The artist exhibited the painting frequently in the decade following its creation. After his mother’s death and facing mounting financial pressures, Whistler sold the painting to the French state in 1891. In 1925 Whistler’s Mother became the first American painting to enter the collection of the Louvre and was moved to the collection of the Musée d’Orsay in 1986.

The painting depicts Anna Whistler dressed in black mourning garb and a white cotton cap, sitting in profile with a lace kerchief in her hands. Her feet rest on a small stool, and behind her is a framed print and a Japanese curtain.

The painting also contains a reference to the location in which it was executed. Whistler’s studio was located in the Chelsea area of London on the River Thames, and the artist was known to frequent the docks in search of views and subjects for portraits. Black Lion Wharf (1859), the framed print shown in the painting, depicts a scene typical of the type Whistler was creating at the time. The Clark’s exhibition features a print of Black Lion Wharf from the Colby College Museum of Art.

The Exhibition

In addition to Black Lion Wharf, the exhibition includes other depictions of Whistler’s surroundings on the River Thames such as Billingsgate (1859, Colby College Museum of Art) and The Pool (1859, The Clark) all of which were later joined into a series known fittingly as The Thames Set and published the same year he created the portrait of his mother. Another group of works, which grew out of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, were Whistler’s nocturnes. His frequent use of the terms “arrangement” and “nocturne” in the titles of his paintings reflects his interest in the musical notions of harmony and balance, characteristic of the aesthetic art movement. These works—represented in the exhibition by two etchings and one lithograph—began as depictions of the River Thames at night and continued during his time in Venice. As Whistler explained: “By using the word ‘nocturne’ I wished to indicate an artistic interest alone, divesting the picture of any outside anecdotal interest which might have been otherwise attached to it. A nocturne is an arrangement of line, form and colour first.” His desire to focus on form and color rather than narrative began with the groundbreaking portrait of his mother.

“The extraordinary visit of Whistler’s Mother to the Clark this summer allows us to study the painting and to situate it within its historical, aesthetic, and physical context,” said Jay A. Clarke, Manton Curator of Prints, Drawings, and Photographs. “We were fortunate to collaborate with the Lunder Consortium for Whistler Studies on the exhibition. Their expertise and assistance were invaluable.”

The composition of Whistler’s Mother reflects the artist’s interest in the Japanese woodblock prints he is known to have collected and admired, and the inclusion of a Japanese textile in the painting reinforces his keen interest in Japonisme. In late nineteenth-century London and Paris, Japanese woodblock prints were widely available and relatively affordable. Many artists of the time, including Whistler, Degas, Cassatt, Renoir, and Monet, were influenced by the Japanese aesthetic. Whistler, as evidenced in Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, not only owned Japanese textiles but also collected woodblock prints, including those by Utagawa Hiroshige I. The exhibition presents a small selection of prints by Hiroshige alongside Whistler’s prints to reinforce their connection. For example, the radical cropping of space in Whistler’s Rotherhithe (1860, Colby College Museum of Art) is indebted to the similarly cropped interior/exterior in Hiroshige’s View from Massaki of Suijin Shrine (1857, Rodbell Family Collection, The Clark).

While Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 is Whistler’s most famous painted portrait, he created hundreds of etchings, lithographic portraits, and drawings of his family, friends, and patrons throughout his life. The exhibition features the portraits Annie Haden (1860, Colby College Museum of Art) and Mrs. Leyland, Sr. (1874–1875, Colby College Museum of Art) and a drawing known as The Sleeper, a portrait of his model Joanna Hiffernan (1863, The Clark) from the artist’s early career when he chose close family and friends as his sitters.

The pared-down composition of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 and the familiar image of motherhood make the image easy to replicate and reinterpret. As is the case with Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and Edvard Munch’s The Scream, Arrangement in Grey and BlackNo. 1 has been parodied, manipulated, and reimagined. A section of Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White explores the painting’s role in popular culture and collective American thought by presenting an array of historical and cultural replications and images such as magazine covers, posters, and photographs.
- See more at: http://www.clarkart.edu/About/Press-Room/Press-Releases/2015/Whistler-s-Mother#sthash.iJqByiau.dpuf

‘WHISTLER’S MOTHER’ ARRIVES JULY 4 AT THE CLARK ART INSTITUTE

For Immediate Release
May 14, 2015

Williamstown, Massachusetts—Independence Day brings an American icon to the Clark Art Institute with the arrival of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 (Portrait of the Artist’s Mother) (1871) by James McNeill Whistler as part of the exhibition Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White, on view July 4 through September 27, 2015. Better known as Whistler’s Mother, the painting has been owned by the French state since 1891 and is in the collection of the Musée d’Orsay, Paris. It is one of the most renowned works of art by an American artist and is considered by many to be the most important American painting not held on American soil.

The painting serves as the centerpiece of an exhibition featuring a selection of Whistler’s prints and drawings, Japanese woodblock prints that inspired the artist, and ephemera that explore the image’s role in popular culture. The exhibition highlights works from the Lunder Collection of James McNeill Whistler at the Colby College Museum of Art as well as from the Clark’s permanent collection. The Clark is one of only two American venues featuring the painting this year and is the only east coast museum to show the iconic painting.

Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White is presented in collaboration with the Colby College Museum of Art and the Lunder Consortium for Whistler Studies. The exhibition is generously supported by a grant from The Lunder Foundation and by Katherine and Frank Martucci.

The painting has an interesting history of exhibition in the United States. In the 1930s The Museum of Modern Art, New York organized an eight-city tour to raise the spirits of Americans during the Depression. At the time, it was a great source of pride that a painting held in such regard by Europeans was painted by an American.

“We look forward to welcoming this great American painting to the Berkshires,” said Michael Conforti, the Felda and Dena Hardymon Director of the Clark. “The Clark is indebted to the Musée d’Orsay for the loan of this extraordinary painting which will be the center of one of our summer 2015 exhibitions. The Clark has exceptional works by Winslow Homer and John Singer Sargent, but no major paintings by Whistler, another great American artist of the late nineteenth century. We are delighted to have the opportunity to present it at the Clark.”

The Painting

Arrangement in Grey and BlackNo. 1 is considered the high point of Whistler’s career. Anna McNeill Whistler posed for the famous portrait in London in 1871 during a time she was living with her son. The artist exhibited the painting frequently in the decade following its creation. After his mother’s death and facing mounting financial pressures, Whistler sold the painting to the French state in 1891. In 1925 Whistler’s Mother became the first American painting to enter the collection of the Louvre and was moved to the collection of the Musée d’Orsay in 1986.

The painting depicts Anna Whistler dressed in black mourning garb and a white cotton cap, sitting in profile with a lace kerchief in her hands. Her feet rest on a small stool, and behind her is a framed print and a Japanese curtain.

The painting also contains a reference to the location in which it was executed. Whistler’s studio was located in the Chelsea area of London on the River Thames, and the artist was known to frequent the docks in search of views and subjects for portraits. Black Lion Wharf (1859), the framed print shown in the painting, depicts a scene typical of the type Whistler was creating at the time. The Clark’s exhibition features a print of Black Lion Wharf from the Colby College Museum of Art.

The Exhibition

In addition to Black Lion Wharf, the exhibition includes other depictions of Whistler’s surroundings on the River Thames such as Billingsgate (1859, Colby College Museum of Art) and The Pool (1859, The Clark) all of which were later joined into a series known fittingly as The Thames Set and published the same year he created the portrait of his mother. Another group of works, which grew out of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, were Whistler’s nocturnes. His frequent use of the terms “arrangement” and “nocturne” in the titles of his paintings reflects his interest in the musical notions of harmony and balance, characteristic of the aesthetic art movement. These works—represented in the exhibition by two etchings and one lithograph—began as depictions of the River Thames at night and continued during his time in Venice. As Whistler explained: “By using the word ‘nocturne’ I wished to indicate an artistic interest alone, divesting the picture of any outside anecdotal interest which might have been otherwise attached to it. A nocturne is an arrangement of line, form and colour first.” His desire to focus on form and color rather than narrative began with the groundbreaking portrait of his mother.

“The extraordinary visit of Whistler’s Mother to the Clark this summer allows us to study the painting and to situate it within its historical, aesthetic, and physical context,” said Jay A. Clarke, Manton Curator of Prints, Drawings, and Photographs. “We were fortunate to collaborate with the Lunder Consortium for Whistler Studies on the exhibition. Their expertise and assistance were invaluable.”

The composition of Whistler’s Mother reflects the artist’s interest in the Japanese woodblock prints he is known to have collected and admired, and the inclusion of a Japanese textile in the painting reinforces his keen interest in Japonisme. In late nineteenth-century London and Paris, Japanese woodblock prints were widely available and relatively affordable. Many artists of the time, including Whistler, Degas, Cassatt, Renoir, and Monet, were influenced by the Japanese aesthetic. Whistler, as evidenced in Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1, not only owned Japanese textiles but also collected woodblock prints, including those by Utagawa Hiroshige I. The exhibition presents a small selection of prints by Hiroshige alongside Whistler’s prints to reinforce their connection. For example, the radical cropping of space in Whistler’s Rotherhithe (1860, Colby College Museum of Art) is indebted to the similarly cropped interior/exterior in Hiroshige’s View from Massaki of Suijin Shrine (1857, Rodbell Family Collection, The Clark).

While Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 is Whistler’s most famous painted portrait, he created hundreds of etchings, lithographic portraits, and drawings of his family, friends, and patrons throughout his life. The exhibition features the portraits Annie Haden (1860, Colby College Museum of Art) and Mrs. Leyland, Sr. (1874–1875, Colby College Museum of Art) and a drawing known as The Sleeper, a portrait of his model Joanna Hiffernan (1863, The Clark) from the artist’s early career when he chose close family and friends as his sitters.

The pared-down composition of Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 and the familiar image of motherhood make the image easy to replicate and reinterpret. As is the case with Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and Edvard Munch’s The Scream, Arrangement in Grey and BlackNo. 1 has been parodied, manipulated, and reimagined. A section of Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White explores the painting’s role in popular culture and collective American thought by presenting an array of historical and cultural replications and images such as magazine covers, posters, and photographs.
- See more at: http://www.clarkart.edu/About/Press-Room/Press-Releases/2015/Whistler-s-Mother#sthash.iJqByiau.dpuf

The New Art of the Fifteenth Century

$
0
0


This book, published by Abbeville Press and written by Shirley Neilsen Blum, is a fresh look at the early Renaissance, considering Florentine and Netherlandish art as a single phenomenon at once deeply spiritual and entirely new

In fifteenth-century Florence and Flanders, painters were using an arsenal of new techniques—including perspective, anatomy, and the accurate treatment of light and shade—to present traditional religious subjects with an unprecedented immediacy and emotional power. Their art was the product of a shared Christian culture, and their patrons included not only nobles and churchmen but also the middle classes of these thriving commercial centers.

Shirley Neilsen Blum offers a new synthesis of this remarkable period in Western art—between the refinements of the Gothic and the classicism of the High Renaissance—when the mystical was made to seem real. In the first part of her text, Blum traces the emergence of a new naturalism in the sculpture of Claus Sluter and Donatello, and then in the painting of Van Eyck and Masaccio.

In the second part, she compares scenes from the Infancy and Passion of Christ as rendered by artists from North and South. Exploring both the images themselves and the theological concepts that lie behind them, she re-creates, as far as possible, the experience of the contemporary fifteenth-century viewer.Abundantly illustrated with color plates of masterworks by Fra Angelico, Botticelli, Rogier van der Weyden, and others, this thought-provoking volume will appeal equally to general readers and students of art history.

Shirley Neilsen Blum, a historian of Renaissance and modern art, is professor emeritus at the State University of New York; she has also taught at the University of Chicago and the University of California at Riverside. Blum's scholarship and teaching have been recognized with a Senior Fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities, a Distinguished Teaching Award from the University of California, and the Charles A. Dana Chair at Colgate University, among other honors. Her publications include Early Netherlandish Triptychs: A Study in Patronage and, most recently, Henri Matisse: Rooms with a View.

Cézanne and the Modern: Masterpieces of European Art from the Pearlman Collection: Cézanne , Degas, van Gogh, Soutine and Modigliani

$
0
0

 Venues

Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England (March 13 – June 22, 2014), 
 Musée Granet, Aix - e n - Provence, France (July 11 – October 5, 2014)
High Museum of Art,  Atlanta, USA (October 25, 2014 – January 11, 2015). 
Vancouver Art Gallery, Vancouver, Canada (February 14 – May 18, 2015),   
 Princeton  University Art Museum, Princeton, N.J. (Sept ember 12, 2015 – January 3, 2016).

Cézanne and the Modern: Masterpieces of  European Art from the Pearlman Collection is a major travelling exhibition  featuring an exceptional collection of  modernist works by European masters. Totaling 50 artworks, this exhibition includes paintings by  Paul  Cézanne ,  Edgar Degas,  Édouard Manet  Amedeo Modigliani, Camille Pissarro , Chaïm Soutine  and Vincent van Gogh, as well as sculpture by Paul Gauguin, Wilhelm Lembruck and Jacques Lipchitz . The jewel of the  exhibition is an astonishing group of 24 works by Paul Cézanne  that covers his entire career as an  artist , including six oils — such as the major 



Paul Cézanne,  Mont Sainte - Victoire (La Montagne Sainte - Victoire) , c. 1904 - 06, oil on canvas, The Henry and Rose  Pearlman Foundation, on long - term loan to the Princeton University Art Museum 


Mont Sainte - Victoire  (1904 – 06); two drawings; and sixteen  watercolours  which constitute one of  the finest and best - preserved groups of Cézanne’s watercolours in the world . 

This exceptional  art collection  was built by  Henry and Rose Pearlman  during the 1940s and 19 50s. Henry Pearlman (1895  – 1974) was a New York City business man who passionately collected European avant - garde art  since 1945 until the end of his life.  Central to the Pearlman’s collecting interests were two artists, the great  expressionist painter Chaim Soutine, of whose work Henry Pearlman was one of the earliest American collectors,  and, most importantly, Paul Cézanne ( 1895 – 1974) . Organized by  the Princeton University Art Museum in cooperation with the Henry and Rose Pearlman Foundation ,  this exhibition marks the first time in over 50 years that the Pearlman Collection  has traveled asacollection,.

 Other key artworks in the exhibition include:   



 Edgar Degas,  After the Bath, Woman Drying Herself (Après le bain, femme s’essuyant) , 1890s, oil on canvas, The  Henry and Rose Pearlman Foundation, on long - term loan to the Princeton University Art Museum  


Degas’  After the Bath, Woman Drying Herself , from the 1890s,  a  magnificent example of how the artist’s radical vision transformed the depiction of the female body in the late 19th century;   





Vincent van Gogh,  Tarascon Stagecoach (La diligence de Tarascon),  1888, oil on canvas, The Henry and Rose Pearlman  Foundation, on long - term loan to the Princeton  University Art Museum 


Van Gogh’s  La diligence de Tarascon (Tarascon Stagecoach)  (1888), a colourful and unusual composition  that reveals the artist’s willingness to paint unconventional views and find beauty in the  everyday ;



Amedeo Modigliani (Italian, 1884–1920)

Jean Cocteau, 1916

Oil on canvas

100.4 x 81.3 cm. (39 1/2 x 32 in.)


Signed upper left: Modigliani

and  Modigliani’s monumental portrait  Jean Cocteau  (1916), which is one of the artist’s most important paintings. 

 More images from the collection:



Édouard Manet (French, 1832–1883)
Young Woman in a Round Hat, ca. 1877–79
Oil on canvas
54.6 x 45.1 cm. (21 1/2 x 17 3/4 in.)
Signed lower right: Manet

Paul Cézanne (French, 1839–1906)

Standing Bather Seen from Behind, ca. 1879-82

Oil on canvas


27.0 x 17.1 cm. (10 5/8 x 6 3/4 in.)






Edgar Degas (French, 1834–1917)

The Morning Bath, ca. 1886

Pastel on buff wove paper

67 x 52.1 cm. (26 3/8 x 20 1/2 in.)


Signed lower left: Degas

Pierre Auguste Renoir (French, 1841–1919)

Nu Dans un Paysage, ca. 1887

Oil on canvas

21 x 31.7 cm. (8 1/4 x 12 1/2 in.)


Signed lower right: Renoir

Paul Cézanne (French, 1839–1906)

Three Pears, ca. 1888–90

Watercolor, gouache, and graphite on cream laid paper


24.2 x 31 cm. (9 1/2 x 12 3/16 in.)




Paul Cézanne (French, 1839–1906)

Cistern in the Park of Chateau Noir, ca. 1900

Oil on canvas


74.3 x 61.0 cm. (29 1/4 x 24 in.)




Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (French, 1864–1901)

Messaline, 1900-01

oil on canvas

97.8 x 78.7 cm. (38 1/2 x 31 in.)

Signed lower left with stamped monogram TL

Chaïm Soutine (French, 1893-1943)

Chemin de la Fontaine des Tins at Céret, ca. 1920

Oil on canvas

81.3 x 78.7 cm. (32 x 31 in.)


Signed lower right: Soutine

 
 
Chaïm Soutine (French, 1893-1943)

View of Céret, ca. 1921–22

Oil on canvas

74 x 85.7 cm. (29 1/8 x 33 3/4 in.)


Signed lower right: Soutine

Chaïm Soutine (French, 1893-1943)

Steeple of Saint-Pierre at Céret, ca. 1922

Oil on canvas

81.3 x 64.8 cm. (32 x 25 1/2 in.)


Signed lower right: Soutine


 







Chaïm Soutine (French, 1893-1943)

Hanging Turkey, ca. 1925

Oil on canvas

95.9 x 72.1 cm. (37 3/4 x 28 3/8 in.)


Signed lower left: Soutine


Chaïm Soutine (French, 1893-1943)

Portrait of a Woman, 1929

Oil on canvas

80.6 x 60.3 cm. (31 3/4 x 23 3/4 in.)


Signed lower right: Soutine

Preston Dickinson

$
0
0

Sotheby's



LOT SOLD. 665,000 USD
 
 
 
 
Preston Dickinson
1891 - 1930
LOT SOLD. 75,000 USD 
 
 Christie's 



Tower of Gold
PRICE REALIZED
$100,000




The Factory
PRICE REALIZED
$68,500



Grain Elevator
PRICE REALIZED
$60,000





Pr.$52,500





Preston Dickinson (1889–1930)
A Pair of Studies for Screens, Summer
Mixed media on board laid down on paper
11 1/16 x 15 15/16 inches





Preston Dickinson (1889–1930)
A Pair of Studies for Screens, Winter
Gouache and graphite on paper laid down on paper
11 1/16 x 15⅝ inches 
 


Swann Galleries



Lot 76: Preston Dickinson's The Peters Mills brought a record price of $60,000

Other note-worthy records were set for Preston Dickinson's The Peters Mills, a 1924 brush, ink, wash and color pastel with pencil that sold for $60,000
on June 12, 2014
 

Ralston Crawford at Auction and In Galleries

$
0
0

 Biography

 Courtesy of Menconi + Schoelkopf (images added)

Recognized as one of the great innovators of Precisionism in the 1930s, Ralston Crawford grew well beyond his early visions of America flexing its newly industrialized muscles. In his later years he grew increasingly concerned with the process of painting as an abstract process, his mature works dealing with a deeper interrogation of the same scenes as some of the shine wore off them. Working and reworking in various media, Crawford at mid-century produced semi-abstract compositions, maintaining always a strong practice of observation. 
 
Ever an innovator, he broadened and deepened the dialogue of post-war American painting where his colleagues remained entrenched in established styles. His experiments with silkscreening and graphic arts helped him to clarify a slick, almost Pop quality. His attentions, however, were bent not to the shiny and new, but also to the collapsing and decaying. His photographs of jazz musicians have been celebrated and his crisp modernist paintings are in important public and private collections, including the Museum of Modern Art, the Whitney Museum of American Art, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. When he died at 71 in 1978, he had influenced several generations of American artists.

Early Life

The son of a ship captain, George Ralston Crawford was born in Ontario in 1906. Though his father would soon trade in the masts and riggings for insurance and real estate sales, young Ralston would forever identify with the transient life of the sailor. He move to New York with the idea of enrolling at the Pratt Institute, but apparently found work on a fruit company boat bound for South America instead. He spent six months traveling with the United Fruit Company on board La Perla, and the affair left its mark: he would retain a Kerouac-like attitude of “may as well travel” for the rest of his life. Following his impulse to travel, he hitched a ride again on La Perla through the Panama Canal and up to Los Angeles. (Haskell, pp. 10-11) There, he enrolled in art classes at the Otis Art Institute. Otis’s curriculum, along with a side gig at Walt Disney Studios, did the double duty of imbuing his aesthetics with a flavor of commercial illustration, while simultaneously confirming that the life of a commercial artist was not for him. The winds shifted after two years in LA, and he was off to pursue the life of the fine artist, this time in Philadelphia.

For Crawford, 1927 was the right moment to be in Philadelphia. He enrolled at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, which had then the same reputation it does now: a conservative institution, it taught the young Crawford what a fine artist is and does. Important, too, was the Barnes Foundation, which had opened its doors only five years earlier. There Crawford found the now world-renowned collection of post-Impressionist painting a stimulating solution to the contradictory pulls of Thomas Eakins and Walt Disney. Cézanne in particular influenced him. Some of the works that survive from this period demonstrate not only a superficial fascination with Cézanne’s plastic form method of building a volume and space, but also a profound appreciation for the adroit manipulation of space in tension with the picture plane.  (Harnsberger, p. 79)



(Illustration: Still Life, Fruit on Table, c. 1931).

Already by 1930, Crawford had appropriated the master’s technique of subtly modulated brushstrokes to create vibrating forms. Back at the Academy, the influence of one of the few remaining modernist members of the faculty, Hugh Henry Breckenridge, also pressed home the chromatic lessons of the master of Aix. Breckenridge was an attentive disciple of Cézanne, and his students included some of the artists with whom Crawford would be associated in the 1930s, including Charles Demuth, John Sloan.

Precisionist Years

For the Precisionists, the stamp of Cézanne was refracted through a uniquely American lens. Cotemporaneous with the broad acceptance of Cubism and with the development of Futurism, the American movement retained a flavor quite distinct from its European counterparts. It should be remembered that the Precisionists in general, and Crawford in particular, were encountering the European vanguard all at once. The post-Impressionists were on view for the first time to American audiences about the same time as Picasso and Braque, along with the multitude of abstract movements of the 1930s. Secondly, the idea of industrial modernity had a very different ring in Pennsylvania than it did in Paris. The connections to cubism are clear enough: they shared crisp edges and sharply delineated planes, views broken up into a multitude of flattened forms. But the American works from the twenties and thirties lacked the dour colors of Braque and Picasso’s analytic cubism, and, while the Parisians were staring down café tables and small groups of figures, Demuth, Dickinson, and Crawford were almost entirely prepossessed with industrial subjects. The staying out of doors and more colorful palette, as well as the handling of space, owed as much to Cézanne as to the cubists and the futurists.

The features of his work that bound Crawford with the Precisionists were personal, rather than the symptom of a shared manifesto; Crawford liked movement, but not necessarily movements. The precise lines of his work proved very effective in the depiction of the sharp-edged architecture of industrial buildings, and so form and content seemed to support one another. Peculiar to Crawford was a special attention paid to silos and elevators. Given Cézanne’s love for cones and cylinders, Crawford had identified in the American landscape the perfect form: a grain silo is just a cone atop a cylinder. Also from Cézanne, Crawford’s work in the thirties activates the sky as a planar, modulated form. Whereas there are precious few skies depicted in cubist paintings, Crawford and his cohort almost never failed to include the sky. But while Demuth would divide up the sky using invented lines—the imagined extensions of lines of architecture— Crawford found novel graphic devices to compose his canvases. As his work in the 1930s progressed, his canvases became more composed. The barns that once stood peacefully centered in the scene gave way to arrangements of foreground elements that ran off the canvas in all directions. By the end of the decade, he had mastered the technique, activating the canvas as a flat and dynamic form.



A major success of the period came with 1939’s Overseas Highway. At first glance, it is a simple exercise in one-point perspective: a pair of lines narrowing to a vanishing point on an unobstructed horizon. Upon closer inspection, however, the painting’s zipping speed is the product of subtle asymmetries and clever balances. The guard rail that seems to reach high above the viewer’s head achieves that studious division of the sky that Crawford elsewhere achieved with dangling ropes and powerlines. The vanishing point itself is off of center in both, and the peculiar placement of the point of view and the commitment to the parallel lines of the pavement bring the road swelling up to meet us, as if we are already on our way. Combining many techniques, it was a breakthrough for the painter. Overseas Highway feels fresher and more modern than his Precisionist forbears, as if the art world is being launched along with the viewer into a cool new future, headed toward the horizon at high speed, the Depression behind, an uncertain but bright future ahead.

The Atomic Age

The paintings of the early 1940s took the successes of Overseas Highway and ran with them. Canvases were now now filled to the brim with shapes. A boat that once sat nicely in the harbor suddenly fills the entire view in  




At the Dock.

The industry that was building the country up for war was now an unignorable presence. That presence was not limited to Crawford’s work, as by 1942 he had been drafted for the military. In this regard, Crawford’s age played a large factor in distancing him from his colleagues of the thirties. He was old enough to be accepted as a significant force in American painting, but not old enough, like Demuth and Sheeler, to avoid service. Not a little did he dislike the sacrifice of these prime years of his career, dutifully he went. Cut off as he was from art-making, he found his way into the Visual Presentation Unit, where he produced, among other graphics, maps showing predicted weather patterns. (Haskell, p. 62) Though he regretted the sacrifice, the weather maps provided some new insights, and indeed, when he was invited to join the stable of Edith Halpert’s Downtown Gallery in 1943, the weather maps were shown alongside his oils. After all, a map is just an abstracted landscape, with the plane of the land tilted radically upward. Along with the rest of his work, the maps garnered favorable attention as well as several graphic art commissions, not least from the magazine Fortune.

After several covers and interior illustrations, Fortune bestowed upon the freshly-minted veteran the distinction of being the sole painter to witness the first public test of a nuclear bomb. On the first of July, 1946, Crawford witnessed the detonation of two nuclear weapons on Bikini Atoll. The bright, glaring work that Crawford produced in response to the event were among those that signaled a shift in his work. A depiction of the power and brilliance of the explosion itself, the work for the first time lacked clear connection to its subject matter. If it was a beginning of a new phase for Crawford, the birth of the atomic age was also a new beginning for a generation of American painters. In this, Crawford’s fear of being out of step came partially true: the power and anxiety of the living under the specter of the bomb was better depicted by the abstract expressionists than by Crawford’s still somewhat comfortable images. They are powerful, but not dreadful or awful, the way Pollock’s work sometimes is. If the explosive power of  




Tour of Inspection (1946, Ralston Crawford Estate) failed to capture a generation’s anxieties, Crawford emerged from the war a changed artist.

Crawford’s commitment to observation, rather than expressionistic outpourings or symbolism, was unshaken –in fact, he redoubled his efforts. By deepening his observation, he began to find new entryways into the picture. He began to embrace new media, returning to a single scene with a crayon, with oil, with silkscreen, experimenting with the ways in which different media brought out different forms. His paintings benefited from the way silkscreening emphasized flat, bright planes of color, as well as from his renewed interest in drawing in pen and ink. But chief of among these tools of innovation was his early adoption of photography.

Ralston Crawford was not alone among painters adopting photography. His fellow Precisionist, Charles Sheeler, had made experimental films, both as independent works (with Paul Strand) and as source material for his paintings. But in the decades since the abstract film Manhatta, photography had grown more independent as an artform, and more practicable as a craft. As Vince Alletti wrote: “The best of these teeter provocatively between documentation and abstraction, anticipating similarly tough work by Robert Adams and Lee Friedlander.” (New Yorker, April 16, 2007) In his post-war pictures, Crawford increasingly embraced the sharp, graphic edges and non-local color. Having photographs handy in the studio allowed him to crop the image to isolate forms and remove elements that would identify scale and location. The forms in his paintings, in this way, became unmoored from their circumstances. Because of photography, some elements became more certain; because of his painterly flattening and removal of detail, the pictures became even more abstract.

The close of the 1940s also marked the beginning of the artist’s thorough engagement with the sounds of New Orleans. Though he had previously traveled to the Big Easy in 1926 and again in 1938, by the early fifties it had become a second home to a man who may have had trouble naming his first. New Orleans is considered the birth place of jazz, and had developed and long maintained unique sounds and performance customs, from the “second line” marching bands and the syncopated march-beat, to multiple lines of improvisation and call and response. The city remains a melting pot of cultural influences, and the music and culture surrounding the music had a unique flavor that appealed immensely to Ralston Crawford. At a time when such mix was not socially acceptable (and, in some circumstances, illegal), Crawford dug deep into the city’s jazz clubs and back rooms.

Jazz

The lifeblood of New Orleans, jazz was not simply a spectator affair. While the 1950s saw the profile of jazz rising in New York as a form of high art, it retained in New Orleans its vibrant connection to life in the streets. Just as bar patrons are free to wander into the street with a drink in their hands, the jazz musician was not a prisoner to the stage, the sound and spectacle mingling with all the other aspects of life—including the end of life. Death, in New Orleans, is a decidedly above-ground affair.

The city’s high water-table demands that the dead be interred literally above ground, in mausoleums, or else risk being disinterred in the next flood. And what elsewhere might be an occasion for solemnity is in New Orleans closer to a celebration; drawing from Louisiana tradition of military brass bands and African and Creole rhythms, the “jazz funeral” features a procession from the home or church of the deceased to the cemetery. Typically the first leg of the jazz funeral is staid and sober, the band playing hymns and spirituals, giving way later to the more famous upbeat numbers like “When the Saints Go Marching In,” and “Didn’t He Ramble” after the body of the deceased is interred. With a song structure based on hymns, New Orleans jazz features call and response as well as a loose form allowing multiple musicians to improvise on the melody simultaneously, while the beat deviates from a metronomic march to an off-kilter syncopation.

Thus did Crawford’s focus return toward the cemetery. His paintings of headstones and mausoleums are not, however, somber meditations, but are infused with the swing and life of a street jazz band. They offer visual parallels to the features of the music that so inspired him: theme and variation, off-center soloing and call and response. As he reworked images in various media, the identifiable theme of the pictures comes in and out of focus, not unlike the melody of a jazz composition. Elements from one painting may crop up, unannounced but perfectly harmonized in seemingly unrelated works, as in Third Avenue Elevated, (1949, oil on canvas 29 ¼ x 40 1/8 inches Walker Art Center) and Nets with Red.

Ralston Crawford thought about his paintings at times explicitly in these musical terms:
“I am very much interested in a kind of pictorial counterpoint—the juxtaposing of one melody or theme in relation to another , or to several. It is out of this argument or contrast that I believe interest is created in pictorial structure. This must be part of the total plan – I am uninterested in producing the decorative.” 

(As quoted in Agee, p. 45)

Crawford’s theme or melody would be a particular industrial scene. Like a line of melody for a jazz musician, that melody could then be transposed into another key, bent out of shape, and inserted into an improvised moment in an entirely different tune. Finding a literal connection between visual and musical form has preoccupied many painters and musicians, from Wassily Kandinsky and Arthur Dove to Claude Debussy and Charles Mingus—but Crawford was unconcerned, as ever, with being literal. He saw the active interpretation of found forms into paint as metaphorically linked to a piece of music through melody and improvisation.

Later Years

Though his attention to industry and sleek machines never faded, over the years the artist’s interest shifted from the shiny and new to the crumbling and scarred. Racecars, always a fascination, gave way to scrap-heap cars; high gloss magazines were replaced with peeling posters and illegibly torn signs. Siskind and Evans would treat similar subjects in strictly formalist terms, but Crawford invested his images with more meaning. One of the artist’s sons has pointed out the possibly grim undertones of these mounting symbols later in his father’s life: car wrecks, crumbling builidings, time-worn tombstones and blistering billboards. (personal correspondence) The pictures themselves retain the brightness and clarity of earlier days, so if there is something to this growing sense of death and destruction, it is approached with a frankness that seems quite in keeping with the artist himself.
“I went to this junk pile many times. In truth, the shapes I found there were indeed more interesting than the new cars. The unpredictable relationships of broken, torn and twisted automobile parts, plus the startlingly unique equality of the individual shapes called for all of my attentiveness. In my continuing line of consciousness they were of course related to the plane wrecks of World War Two and to my recollections of Bikini, where I saw Test Able.

The positive nature of seeing transcended the dreary connotations of these shapes. In short, my reaction was one of extreme pleasure. I am quite certain that this picture will in no way affect the automobile accident rate. Such motivation is out of my field. But I will be pleased if it provides for the person seeing it some of the satisfaction that I got from viewing the wrecked cars.” (as quoted in Agee, p. 46)

Ralston Crawford died in Texas in 1978. His legacy as one of the luminaries of Precisionism retains its luster, and he has become increasingly esteemed as a proto-pop artist and a photographic documentarian. Ultimately, his work stands as a lasting invitation to the pure joy of looking, and seeing. For his love of the city of New Orleans and the music of its streets, Crawford decided to make the city his final resting place. Apropos of a life spent on the road, his cemetery monument is engraved, after the old jazz funeral standard, “Didn’t he ramble.”

Christie's 2006




Pr.$180,000

 Christie's 2008






  Whitney Musuem

Ralston Crawford, Steel Foundry, Coatesville, Pa., 1936–37  37.10

Ralston Crawford, Steel Foundry, Coatesville, Pa., 1936–37  37.10


National Gallery of Art



Crawford, Ralston
American, 1906 - 1978
Lights in an Aircraft Plant
1945
oil on canvas
overall: 77.1 x 102.2 cm (30 3/8 x 40 1/4 in.)
framed: 88.9 x 114.3 x 6 cm (35 x 45 x 2 3/8 in.)
Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Burton Tremaine
1971.87.1
 Menconi + Schoelkopf 



 Ralston Crawford
Bora Bora No. 2, 1975
Oil on canvas
30 x 40 inches
Signed lower left: RC



Ralston Crawford
Signs, 1973-76
Oil on canvas
30 x 40 inches
Signed at lower left with initials: RC  




Ralston Crawford
Coal Car, 1945
Gouache on paperboard
8 x 12 inches (image)
20.3 x 30.5 cm (image)
11 x 15 inches (sheet)
27.9 x 38.1 cm (sheet)
Signed at lower left: RALSTON CRAWFORD  





Ralston Crawford
St. Ann Street, 1954
Oil on canvas
24 x 18 inches
61 x 45.7 cm
Signed at lower left: RALSTON CRAWFORD  




Ralston Crawford
Nets with Red, 1956
Oil on canvas
19 1/2 x 25 1/2 inches
49.5 x 64.8 cm
Signed at lower right center: RALSTON CRAWFORD  





Ralston Crawford
Masts and Rigging, 1975
Oil on canvas
40 x 30 inches
101.6 x 76.2 cm  




Ralston Crawford
The Sails No. 5, 1956
Oil on canvas
26 x 40 inches
66 x 101.6 cm
Signed and dated on stretcher: Ralston Crawford / Started Apr. 17, 1956  




Ralston Crawford
Box Car, 1941
Watercolor on paper
12 x 16 inches
30.5 x 40.6 cm  

Robert Vonnoh

$
0
0

 Biography, courtesy of Menconi + Schoelkopf

Robert Vonnoh was born in Hartford, Connecticut to German immigrants. His father, a cabinetmaker, moved the family to Boston in 1861 before being drafted into service during the Civil War, service from which he would not return. Robert attended grammar school and later took art classes in Boston, and by the end of the 1870s he was teaching art and working professionally as an artist. Teaching at the Boston Free Evening Drawing Schools and at Thayer Academy helped finance an initial trip to Paris. He studied at the Académie Julian and by the 1890s was taking up color and an open brush stroke as his tools of expression. He taught at the Pennsylvania Academy and the School of the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, and joined the National Academy, serving as an ambassador of French Impressionism to an increasingly receptive American audience.

Menconi + Schoelkopf

 

Robert Vonnoh
The Bridge at Grez,
Oil on canvas
23 1/2 x 19 1/2 inches
59.7 x 49.5 cm
Signed on verso: Vonnoh


Sotheby's



LOT SOLD. 9,375


Christie's








Skinner



 Girl from the North
Signed "Vonnoh" u.l., titled and inscribed "Vonnoh" on the stretcher.
Oil on canvas, 13 7/8 x 11 1/8 in. (35.2 x 28.3 cm), framed.
Condition: Mild surface grime. 

Alfred Henry Maurer at Auction and in Galleries

$
0
0



The Phillips Collection

ALFRED MAURER (1868–1932)

Alfred Maurer was one of the first American painters to reflect the influence of European modernism in his painting. Born in New York, Maurer studied in 1884 at the National Academy of Design, New York, where he became recognized as an accomplished painter of portraits inspired by those of James A. M. Whistler and American impressionist William Merritt Chase.

From 1897–1914 Maurer lived in Paris where he became acquainted with fellow Americans Arthur Dove and Gertrude and Leo Stein. It was in the Stein’s salon, a well-known meeting place for Americans and modern French artists, that Maurer met Henri Matisse. The intense color and expressive freedom of Matisse’s fauvist paintings forced Maurer to reexamine the fundamentals of his art. Maurer’s painting between 1905 and 1914 became the work of an artist whose gift for lyric expression had been released for the first time. Using the bold colors of the fauve palette and the dark, rough outlines of pre-cubist art, Maurer attacked his canvases with renewed vigor. Widely respected by his avant-garde contemporaries, Maurer exhibited in 1909 at Alfred Stieglitz’s Gallery 291 in New York, in the 1913 New York Armory Show, and was an associate member of the modernist Salon d’Automne in Paris.

In 1914, on the eve of World War I, Maurer permanently returned to New York. For Maurer the departure from Paris was painful, but he continued to increase his mastery of modernism, assimilating aspects of cubism and even venturing into abstraction at a time when such developments were anathema to popular opinion in the United States.

In 1924 the art dealer Ernest Weyhe purchased the contents of Maurer’s studio—more than 255 works—and Weyhe became his artistic representative, providing Maurer long-awaited financial security. At this point in Maurer’s career, Duncan Phillips began collecting Maurer’s works on Weyhe’s advice. The Phillips Collection owns five works by Maurer, four late oil paintings and one watercolor:



ALFRED MAURER (1868–1932)

Still Life with Artichoke and Bread, I, circa 1929-1930 










ALFRED MAURER (1868–1932)

Still Life with Doily, circa 1930



ALFRED MAURER (1868–1932)

The Florentines, circa 1929 


 

ALFRED MAURER (1868–1932)

The Old Tree, circa 1924


Menconi + Schoelkopf




Alfred H. Maurer
Still Life with Pears, c. 1928
Oil on masonite
13 1/2 x 30 1/2 inches 


Also see

Alfred Maurer: At the Vanguard of Modernism


 Sotheby's 2014




LOT SOLD. 100,000 USD

 Sotheby's 2013




LOT SOLD. 12,500 USD

Sotheby's 2011


Lot. Vendu 6,250 USD
  

Sotheby's 2007




LOT SOLD. 24,000 USD

Christie's 2014


 


Christie's 2012


Pr.$27,500

 Christie's 2011









 Christie's 2008



 
 
 



 

Emile Albert Gruppe

$
0
0

 Sotheby's 





LOT SOLD. 31,250 USD



LOT SOLD. 20,000 USD



LOT SOLD. 9,375 USD


LOT SOLD. 5,625 USD


Christie's


 



Pr.$23,750

Emile A. Gruppe Gallery, Inc. 

These Emile A. Gruppe paintings are currently for sale.  Please inquire for prices.

Emile Gruppe Gallery
Evening Light, Gloucester
25 X 30

Emile Gruppe Gallery
Morning Bass Rocks
30 X 36

Emile Gruppe Gallery
Old Timer (circa 1940)
36 X 30

Emile Gruppe Gallery
Rocks and Surf
20 X 24

Emile Gruppe Gallery
Hauling the Nets
36 X 40

Bass Rocks Emile A. Gruppe
Bass Rocks, Gloucester MA
 30 X 36


Birches on Hillside by Emile A. Gruppe
Birches on Hillside30 X 25
Palm Tree with Red Roof by Emile A. Gruppe
Palm Tree With Red Roof
24 X 20
Winter Stream
30 X 36


Emile Gruppe Gallery
Autumn 1939
20 X 24



More images:


Emile Gruppe Lady In Red 



Emile Gruppe Winter Landcape

Sold at auction for $59,500
  

Martin Johnson Heade

$
0
0

Biography
Martin Johnson Heade (originally Heed) was born in Lumberville, in Bucks County, Pennsylvania on August 11, 1819. He received his earliest artistic training from the painter Edward Hicks (1780-1849) and perhaps had additional instruction from Hicks' younger cousin Thomas, a portrait painter. The influence of these two artists is evident in Heade's earliest works, which were most often portraits painted in a rather stiff and unsophisticated manner.

Heade traveled abroad around 1838 (the precise date of this first European trip is uncertain), and settled in Rome for two years. He made his professional debut in 1841 when his Portrait of a Little Girl (present location unknown) was accepted for exhibition at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts in Philadelphia. In 1843 his Portrait of a Young Lady (present location unknown) was shown at New York's National Academy of Design.

Following a second trip to Europe in 1848 Heade attained a somewhat greater artistic sophistication and began to exhibit more regularly. He moved frequently in the late 1840s and early 1850s, establishing a pattern of itinerancy that would persist throughout his life. Heade gradually concentrated less and less on portrait painting, and by the mid-1850s was starting to experiment with landscape painting.

In 1859 he settled in New York, where he met Frederic Edwin Church, who became one of his few close friends in the American art world. Heade was drawn to coastal areas and began to specialize in seascapes and views of salt marshes; soon he was receiving praise for his ability to capture changing effects of light, atmosphere, and meteorological conditions.

In the late 1850s and early 1860s he began to experiment with still-life painting, an interest he would maintain for the rest of his career. He continued to travel in the eastern United States and then, in 1863, made the first of three trips to South America. Church had already been to the tropics twice, and his large-scale paintings of dramatic South American scenes had won him widespread fame and critical approval. Although Church encouraged his friend to seek out equally spectacular scenery for his own paintings, Heade was generally interested in more intimate and less dramatic views.

While in Brazil in 1863 he undertook a series of small pictures called The Gems of Brazil (c. 1863-1864, Manoogian collection), showing brightly colored hummingbirds in landscape settings. He hoped to use these images in an elaborate illustrated book he planned to write about the tiny birds, but the project was never completed. Nevertheless, he maintained his interest in the subject and in the 1870s began to paint pictures combining hummingbirds with orchids and other flowers in natural settings. During these years he continued to paint marsh scenes, seascapes, still lifes, and the occasional tropical landscape.

In later life Heade's wanderings took him to various spots, including British Columbia and California. Never fully accepted by the New York art establishment--he was, for instance, denied membership in the Century Association and was never elected an associate of the National Academy of Design--Heade eventually settled in Saint Augustine, Florida, in 1883. He was married that same year and at last enjoyed a reasonably stable domestic and professional existence. He also formed the first productive relationship of his career with a patron, the wealthy oil and railroad magnate Henry Morrison Flagler, who would commission and purchase several dozen pictures over the next decade.

Heade continued to paint subjects that he had previously specialized in, such as orchids and hummingbirds, but he now also turned his attention to Florida marsh and swamp scenes and still lifes of cut magnolia leaves and flowers. Heade and his work were largely forgotten by the time of his death on in St. Augustine on September 4, 1904, and it was only with the general revival of interest in American art in the 1940s that attention was once again turned to him and his reputation restored.

Christie's 2006



Pr.$114,000


Christie's 2015







 
National Gallery of Art

Heade, Martin Johnson
, American, 1819 - 1904
Rio de Janeiro Bay
1864
oil on canvas

Heade, Martin Johnson
, American, 1819 - 1904
Cattleya Orchid and Three Hummingbirds
1871
oil on wood


Heade, Martin Johnson (painter)
, American, 1819 - 1904
Sunlight and Shadow: The Newbury Marshes
c. 1871/1875
oil on canvas
Giant Magnolias on a Blue Velvet Cloth
c. 1890
oil on canvas
 

Norman Rockwell Museum Commemorates 70th Anniversary of United Nations Through Exhibition of Rockwell’s Humanitarian Works

$
0
0

We the Peoples: Norman Rockwell’s United Nations To Open June 20 at United Nations Visitor Center in New York City





Norman Rockwell (1894-1978), “United Nations,” 1953. Study for an unfinished illustration. Pencil and charcoal on paper. Norman Rockwell Museum Collections.

Beyond the legendary status that he had achieved during his lifetime, artist Norman Rockwell (1894-1978) was a masterful visual communicator with a deeply held belief in the imperative of peace, prosperity and basic human rights for all the people of the world. His compassionate images of family, community, and the challenging issues facing a rapidly changing world became a defining national influence, reaching viewers by the millions in the most popular periodicals of his day.

In 1952, at the height of the Cold War and two years into the Korean War, Rockwell conceived an image of the United Nations as the world’s hope for the future. His appreciation for the newly formed organization and its mission inspired a complex work portraying members of the Security Council and 65 people representing the nations of the world.

Researched and developed to the final drawing stage, Rockwell’s United Nations never actually made it to canvas, but his desire to reach out to a global community and emphasize the commonality of mankind found its forum in the 1961 painting, 

 

Norman Rockwell (1894-1978), “Golden Rule,” 1961. Oil on canvas, 44 1/2″ x 39 1/2″. Cover illustration for “The Saturday Evening Post,” April 1, 1961. Norman Rockwell Museum Collections. ©SEPS: Curtis Licensing, Indianapolis, IN

Golden Rule, which appeared on the cover of The Saturday Evening Post and later as a large mosaic at the United Nations.

This summer, Norman Rockwell Museum will honor the 70th anniversary of the United Nations with an unprecedented exhibition at the United Nations Headquarters, uniting the mosaic with Rockwell’s Golden Rule painting, his United Nations drawing, and other works that reflect the artist’s personal beliefs in universal commonalities of mankind as a “citizen of the world.”

We the Peoples: Norman Rockwell’s United Nations will be on view at the UN’s Visitors Center in New York City, from June 20 through September 15, 2015.

“Norman Rockwell’s United Nations brings the UN Charter to life,” notes United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. “It is a reminder that the United Nations remains the home and hope of ‘we the peoples.’”

“This unique exhibition bridges the local and the global,” adds United Nations Deputy Secretary-General, Jan Eliasson. “Spotlighting an iconic artist who showed the ideals of home, while also beckoning us to the dreams and aspirations of the world at large.”

“Norman Rockwell was a keen observer of people and believed that every person mattered. As he matured as an artist, his subject matter frequently addressed issues of social change and our common humanity,” says Norman Rockwell Museum Director/CEO Laurie Norton Moffatt.

“We are honored to be partnering with the United Nations, at the invitation of Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson, for this special exhibition commemorating the 70th anniversary of the organization’s peacekeeping efforts. Eliasson believes that Norman Rockwell’s artwork captures the humanitarian aims of the United Nations and embodies ideals for all people. Indeed, his interest in portraying international figures, America’s civil rights movement, the early work of the Peace Corps and the United Nations, and The Four Freedoms (soon to celebrate their own 75th anniversary), informed and helped shape civil society in America. We are proud to be able to share this inspiring and heartfelt display of his work, from our permanent collection.


Organized by Norman Rockwell Museum with support from the United Nations Foundation, We the Peoples features 33 original artworks, and marks the first showing the artist’s rare 1953 drawing, United Nations, outside of Stockbridge. Along with 1961’s Golden Rule painting, the exhibition will feature idea sketches, color studies, and notes for both artworks.

A selection of reference photos taken by the artist at the UN, featuring several of its ambassadors and members of its Security Council, will also be displayed, along with photographs of local models, taken in his Arlington, Vermont studio in 1952, as reference for the artwork.

Other highlights from the exhibition include a series of travel paintings and drawings created by Norman Rockwell in the early 1960s, featuring spontaneous oil portraits of citizens from India and Russia; 1955 drawings from the artist’s sketchbook reflect his observations during a worldwide trip for Pan American Airlines’ advertising campaign; and two paintings of the Peace Corps in India, created for Look magazine in 1966, showcase Rockwell’s idealism and hopeful outlook for the future; digital reproductions of some of his most iconic Civil Rights era paintings also will be included. Additional archival documents and video will support the exhibition.

“Norman Rockwell’s United Nations reminds us that the people of the world look to their leaders to work together at the UN to create a better world for all,” said Kathy Calvin, the United Nations Foundation’s President and CEO.   “For the past 70 years, the UN has worked with governments around the world to help build peace, human rights, and prosperity in a rapidly changing and complicated world, and it will continue to do so for the next 70. People around the world hope for a future in which we can end extreme poverty and inequality, and combat the impacts of climate change — the UN is working with governments to establish global goals and a plan to make them a reality. In this crucial anniversary year, the UN Foundation is proud to support an exhibit that reminds us just how important the role of the UN is to all of us.”

Also on display, the towering glass mosaic of Rockwell’s Golden Rule was presented to the United Nations in 1985 as a 40th anniversary gift on behalf of the United States by then First Lady Nancy Reagan, made possible by the Thanks-Giving Square Foundation. In 2014, the newly restored mosaic was rededicated by the Permanent Mission of the United States by Assistant Deputy Secretary General Jan Eliasson, whose vision was the impetus for this exhibition.

Bruce Museum Greenwich CT: Seven Deadly Sins Exhibition Part of Collaboration among Area Museums

$
0
0


The galleries of the Bruce Museum will be bursting with pride this summer, and into falwith the exhibition The Seven Deadly Sins: Pride  June 27 through October 18, part of a groundbreaking series of area exhibitions exploring the Seven Deadly Sins. Presented by seven members of the Fairfield/Westchester Museum Alliance (FWMA), the Seven Deadly Sins exhibitions represent the group’s first ever collaborative effort.

Other area exhibitions in the Seven Deadly SinsFWMA collaboration include: •Lust, open now through July 26, Hudson Valley Center for Contemporary Art•Seven Deadly Sins: Wrath –Force of Nature, open now through September 7, Wave Hill•Envy, An Installation by Adrien Broom, open now through September 26, Hudson River Museum•Emilie Clark: The Delicacy of Decomposition, exploring Gluttony, opening July 12 (through September 6), Katonah Museum of Art•Greed, GOLD, opening July 12 (through October 11), Neuberger Museum of Art•Sloth, opening July 19 (through October 18), The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum.

“The Seven Deadly Sins have played a significant role in theology, literature and art since the Middle Ages,” says Susan Ball, Deputy Director of the Bruce Museum and a curator of the Bruce’se xhibition. 

“Pride, or superbia, represents the mother of all sins and the one from which all others arise –the root of a many-branched tree .It’s a fascinating,intriguing subject, and we’re delighted to be presenting it at the Bruce.” 

The Bruce Museum exhibition places the sin of Pride within a historical context, presenting nearly 50 works ranging from Dürer works on paper from as far back as 1498 to Fay Ku’s 2014 graphite and oil on mylar. Susan Ball and Co-Curator Amanda Skehan have selected paintings, engravings, etchings, lithographs, illustrated books, magazines, three-dimensional objects and more from private collections, galleries, and institutions that include Yale University Art Gallery, Minneapolis Institute of Art, National Gallery of Art, Princeton Art Museum, Philadelphia Museum of Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Brooklyn Museum, and The Clark Art Institute. 

The exhibition’s curators point out that the show is intended not only to put the sin of pride within a historical context, but also to encourage discussion, raisingquestions about the history of morality and moralizing.

“The debate about the definition of sinfulness in general and each specific transgression in particular has raged for centuries,” Ball says. “One might ask, at what point is the line between healthy self-esteem, or pride, and the sin of arrogant self-aggrandizement, or pridefulness, crossed?”






Hendrick Goltzius (Dutch, 1558-1617) after Cornelis van Haarlem (Dutch, 1562-1638) Phaeton from The Disgracers, 1588 Engraving Collection of The Hearn Family Trust Photograph by Paul Mutino 







Fay Ku (American, 1974-) Juno's Creatures, 2014Graphite and oil on mylar, 42 x 30 in. Courtesy of the artist and Claire Oliver Gallery, New York


  
Jan Pietersz Saenredam (Dutch, 1565-1607) after Abraham Bloemaert (Dutch, 1564-1651)Temptation of Man, from The History of Adam and Eve, 1604EngravingCollection of The Hearn Family Trust Photograph by Paul Mutino




Honoré Daumier (French, 1808–1879)Mlle. Etienne-Joconde-Cunégonde-Bécassin de Constitutionnel..., 1834 Lithograph, 17 7/8 x 14 in. David Tunick, Inc. New York Photograph courtesy of David Tunick, Inc. New York



Gabriel Schachinger (1850-1912 )Sweet Reflections, 1886 Oil on canvas, 51 x 31 in. Woodmere Art Museum: Bequest of Charles Knox Smith Photograph by Rick Echelmeyer
 

High Museum of Art Premieres Major U.S. Exhibition of Alex Katz Landscapes

$
0
0

The High Museum of Art presents a major exhibition of 60 works created between 1954 and 2013 by internationally acclaimed American artist Alex Katz, including 15 monumental landscape paintings to be displayed publicly together for the first time. “Alex Katz, This Is Now” is one of the largest exhibitions focused on the artist’s landscapes in almost 20 years. The High is the sole U.S. venue for the exhibition, which will also tour to the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao.

On view from June 21 to Sept. 6, 2015, the exhibition traces Katz’s unique artistic treatment of the landscape throughout the trajectory of his career, from his 1950s collages that use the environment as a setting for the human figure, to the artist’s later works, which illustrate Katz’s shift to landscape as the dominant subject. Approximately one third of the paintings featured in the exhibition were created by Katz within the last decade, offering visitors an opportunity to view the artist’s contemporary works alongside early examples from his career.

“The works in ‘This Is Now’ reveal the absolute clarity and power of Katz’s vision, which has enabled his work to stand out among his contemporaries since the 1950s as new art movements were introduced,” said Michael Rooks, Wieland Family curator of modern and contemporary art at the High. “Today, at the age of 87, Katz seems as young as any emerging artist. He paints with gutsiness and a personal resolve that has driven his practice for six decades, but which has become increasingly accelerated in recent years, reflecting a uniquely American boldness and steadfastness of purpose.”

“We are delighted to build on the High’s commitment to engage our audiences with the work of living artists and to provide a platform for such a major figure in American art,” said Michael E. Shapiro, Nancy and Holcombe T. Green, Jr. director of the High.

Katz utilizes a signature shorthand of rapid paint-handling to convey essential, abridged imagery, which is even more urgent and powerful in the landscapes of his late career. “This Is Now” places particular focus on what Katz calls his “environmental paintings.” These works, in monumental size and scale, engulf viewers with their expansive, painterly surfaces that depict moments of intense observation in the landscape—what Katz describes as “flashes” of perception or “quick things passing.”

In these paintings, images are often cropped and lack a specific point of spatial reference, such as a horizon line, thus inviting a contemplative experience and generating the feeling of immersion in Katz’s open-ended pictorial space. Works in “This Is Now” demonstrate the very deliberate choices that Katz makes to translate the temporal nature of “quick things passing” into keenly observed and powerfully felt moments of perception—when the understanding of visual information and the construction of one’s relationship to it happen simultaneously.

Among the 15 monumental landscape paintings featured in the exhibition are two recent acquisitions from the High’s collection that exemplify Katz’s unique style: 





“Winter Landscape 2” (2007) and 




“Twilight” (1988). 

“Winter Landscape 2” depictsa stand of trees that have shed their leaves, which are set against a cool, snowy background. In the galleries, the painting is complemented by works from Katz’s “January” series, which incorporate the same composition, demonstrating Katz’s repeated return to subjects and specific imagery. “Twilight” features small slivers of a moonlit sky as seen through the top of a grove of shadowy fir trees.

Other significant works in the exhibition include:





  • “10:30 am” (2006) – Elements of this large-scale work demonstrate what Katz calls “environmental” painting. No horizon line or ground plane is indicated in the composition. Instead, it provides a vast, indefinable pictorial space that viewers are invited to enter. A series of tree trunks are rhythmically located across the surface of the painting, while an allover pattern of leaves provides a counterpoint.
  • “Blue Umbrella #2” (1972) – Perhaps Katz’s best-known image, painted of his wife Ada beneath an umbrella, this work is an early example of Katz’s use of the environment as a setting for the figure.
  • “7:45pm Monday, 7:45pm Tuesday, 7:45pm Wednesday, 7:45pm Thursday” (1998) – One of Katz’s largest paintings, the work consists of four large panels and depicts four separate moments of the same setting at dusk.
Fundamental to his artistic practice, Katz has cited landscape as “a reason to devote my life to painting.” Upon Katz’s graduation from The Cooper Union in 1949, he began studying at the Skowhegan School for Painting and Sculpture in Maine, where he was exposed to painting en plein air. That experience was pivotal in his development as an artist, and landscape painting has remained a fundamental aspect of his practice through subsequent decades.

In the late 1950s, Katz invented a new mode of painting, radically departing from the mainstream American art of the time. Working in a style that became his signature— characterized by the artist’s fixed concentration on a central subject, typically isolated against a monochromatic ground, or landscape—Katz created representational paintings that challenged the New York School’s critical authority, which championed the dominance of non-objective, abstract painting at the time. His paintings corresponded directly to the external appearance of the people and places around him—what American Abstract Expressionist painter Barnett Newman called “object matter.”

Katz applied a renewed focus on landscape as a central theme in his work in the 1980s. He began to produce his monumental paintings, stripping away unnecessary information and representing his subjects in a way that is as much about the essence of form as it is about light, time, and the appearance of the world around him.

Accompanying “This Is Now” is a fully illustrated catalogue with essays by Rooks, art critic Margaret Graham, and artist David Salle, as well as poems by John Godfrey and Vincent Katz, the artist’s son. 



Alex Katz, Sunset 5, 2008 , oil on linen, 274.3 cm x 487.7 cm/ 9' x 16'© Pace Wildenstein- 22nd St.


Alex Katz’s “My Mother’s Dream” (1998)
 
About Alex Katz


Alex Katz (born Brooklyn, N.Y., 1927) is represented in more than 100 museums worldwide, including the Art Institute of Chicago; the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.; the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris; The Tate Gallery, London; the Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna; the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; and the Museum of Modern Art, New York, among many others. Katz has been the subject of more than 200 solo exhibitions and nearly 500 group exhibitions around the world since 1951.

Setting out as a young painter in the 1950s, Katz immersed himself in the art world of New York, then populated with the larger-than-life figures of Abstract Expressionism to whom most artists of his generation aspired to emulate. However, in spite of the preeminence of that movement, Katz took a separate path that represented a new direction in painting. Inspired by the open structure of Jackson Pollock’s allover paintings, Katz made the radical decision to apply Pollock’s formal framework to representational painting, employing the idea of the color field as environmentalspace between and among the things that populated his canvases.

Katz began exhibiting his work in 1954, and since that time has produced a celebrated body of work that includes paintings, drawings, sculpture and prints. His earliest work took inspiration from various aspects of mid-century American culture and society, including television, film and advertising, and over the past five-and-a-half decades he has established himself as a preeminent painter of modern life. Utilizing characteristically wide brushstrokes, large swaths of color, and refined compositions, Katz created what art historian Robert Storr called "a new and distinctive type of realism in American art which combines aspects of both abstraction and representation."

Night Vision: Nocturnes in American Art

$
0
0

The first major museum survey dedicated to scenes of night in American art from 1860 to 1960—fromt he introduction of electricity to the dawn of the Space Age—opened at the Bowdoin College Museum of Art (BCMA) this June. 

Night Vision: Nocturnes in American Art explores the critical importance of nocturnal imagery in the development of modern art by bringingtogether90worksin a range of media—including paintings, prints, drawings, photographs, and sculptures—created by such leading American artists as Ansel Adams, Charles Burchfield, Winslow Homer, Lee Krasner, Georgia O’Keeffe, Albert Ryder, John Sloan, Edward Steichen, and Andrew Wyeth, among others.

Featuring works from the BCMA’s robust collection of American art,as well as loans from 30 prestigious public and private collections across the United States—such as The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Phillips Collection; Philadelphia Museum of Art;a nd Museum of Fine Arts, Boston—the exhibition provides visitors with an opportunity to consider transformations in American art across generations and traditional stylistic confines. 

Organized by BCMA Curator Joachim Homann, and on view at Bowdoin from June 27 through October 18, 2015, Night Vision demonstrates the popularity of the theme with American artists of diverse aesthetic convictions and investigate show they responded to the unique challenges of picturing the night. 

The works featured in Night Vision reflect the diversityof subject matters that attracted artists to night scenes—ranging from reflections of moonlight on ocean waves, to encounters in electrified urban streets,to firework celebrations. For somemid-19th-centuryartists, such as Albert Bierstadt, paintings of the night offered the compelling artistic challenge of representing the natural elements of clouds, moon, and sky when shrouded in darkness, while at the same time providing rich opportunities for the symbolic use of light. 

Following the industrial revolution and emergence of electricity in thelate19thand early 20th centuries, artists such as Winslow Homer, Albert Pinkham Ryder, and Charles Burchfield began to use nighttime conditions as a platform to disregard the conventions of naturalism in favor of new techniques, motifs, and artistic ideas. Across the range of works presented in Night Vision, visitors will see how reduced visual information and an altered perception in the dark tested artists’ ability to render shadow, light, and form.This lack of light ultimately resulted in less illustrative scenes and transformedt he night into an arena for stylistic experimentation and the rise of abstraction in the early-mid-20thcentury.

American artists during this period perceived the night as a catalyst for creative inspiration, expressive possibilities, and picturing nature’s infinite mystery,” said Homann. “When they claimed the moon for themselves, these artists occupied the night as a time of heightened observation and self-reflection—allowing them to become invisible, turn inward, and express personal truths in unique and poetic ways. Bringing this collection of nocturnes together for the first time, Night Vision seeks to expand the broader discourse on American art, the rise of modernism, and the value of art as personal expression.”

Night Vision is organized chronologically beginning with landscape artists’ visions of moonlight, moving to early Modernists’ experimental representations of electrified evenings,and concluding with interpretations of the night by American realists and abstract artists. Notable works in the exhibition include: 



Winslow Homer’s The Fountains at Night, World’s Columbian Exposition (1893), an oil painting created in response to the 1893 World’s Fairin Chicago.The work depicts Frederick MacMonnies’ Columbian Fountain, a monumental neoclassical sculpture illuminated by electricity, helping to promote the United States as a leader in art, science, and industry. 



Henry Ossawa Tanner’s Nicodemus Visiting Jesus (1899), the artist’s renowned painting of a moment in the Gospel of John during which the Pharisee Nicodemus listens intently to Christ’s teachings. Tanner, a master of the religious nocturne, uses light in subtle variations to create a spiritual aura, enhancing the message of the biblical subject matter. This work was one of several paintings Tanner created during his two trips to Jerusalem between 1897 and 1899, after expatriating himself from the United States due to racial discrimination. It was bought by the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, of which the artist was the first African American graduate.



.George Bellows’s Outside the Big Tent (1912), one of two oil paintings the artist created documenting a benefitcircus organized by hiswife, Emma, in her hometown of Montclair, New Jersey.Bellows submitted this work’s companion painting, The Circus, to the Armory Show in1913, where it received high praise for its drama and evocative quality. Both Outside the Big Tent and The Circusexhibit the artist’s signature dynamic brushwork, and predilection for painting spontaneous movement and action.



 Charles Burchfield’s The Night Wind (1918), a haunting watercolor portraying the unsettling effects of darkness and the elements on the human experience as clouds and snow drifts morph into monstrous shapes overtaking a homestead. 




New York Night , 1928-1929 Georgia O'Keeffe



Radiator Building — Night, New York by Georgia O'Keeffe 1927 

•Georgia O’Keeffe’s New York Night (1927), a prime example of the artist’s now signature modernist style—as well as her shift from depicting nature’s landscapes to urban scenery—developed during her time in New York City between 1926 and 1929. A particularly popular subject during this period, New York skyscrapers were perceived as a symbol of technological innovation. O’Keeffe’s renderings were created based on observations of the height and distance of various structures, as well as the careful study of nighttime conditionsand the interplay between light, wind, and the moon. New York Night is one of several paintings that captured the view from the artist’s apartment at the Shelton Hotel. 



 Andrew Wyeth’s Night Hauling(1944), an unsettling depiction of a nocturnal lobster thief at work just as the threat of air raids duringWorld War II made the night a time of anxiety. The painting testifies to Wyeth’s ability to record an unusual light conditionwith great accuracy—phosphorescent algae growing in seawater. 



Beauford Delaney’s Untitled (Jazz Club) (c. 1950), one of the artist’s depictions of Harlem’s vibrant jazz scene early in his career. During the 1940s and 50s, Delaney’s work focused on portraits, modernist interiors, and street scenes, which he rendered using impasto and large areas of saturated color. It was during this time that he forged close connections with Alfred Stieglitz, Georgia O’Keeffe, and Al Hirschfeld, whose work influenced his own artistic sensibility.



Night Vision is accompanied by a fully illustrated catalogue, which includes a lead essay by Joachim Homannon the allure of the night for modern artists from Georgia O’Keeffe to Lee Krasner.C ontributions by Linda Docherty, Associate Professor Emerita of Art History; Alexander Nemerov, Professor of Art and Art History, Stanford University; Avis Berman, art historian and curator, New York; and Daniel Bosch, poet and faculty member, Emory University, explore aspects of American night scenes, such as the nighttime celebration of the Fourth of July, the symbolism of the moon, urban nightlife, and visual images of the night invoked in poetry of the period.

Auerbach, Chagall, Gertler, Grosz, and Soutine: Masterpieces from the Ben Uri Collection

$
0
0

Out Of Chaos; Ben Uri: 100 Years in London running from 2 July to 13 December 201 in Somerset House: 


In this exhibition, a group of rarely seen masterworks by mainly Jewish émigré artists will go on show from the Ben Uri collection, including works by the first Jewish Royal Academician, Solomon Hart, Mark Gertler, David Bomberg, First World War poet Isaac Rosenberg, Jacob Epstein, Max Liebermann, Josef Herman, Frank Auerbach, Leon Kossoff and R B Kitaj.

A group of important recent acquisitions will also be shown including



 La Soubrette (1933), a rare portrait – probably the finest in the UK – by Chaïm Soutine, acquired in 2012; 



The Interrogation (1938) by George Grosz, acquired in 2010; 




Chagall’s rare and rediscovered response to the Holocaust, Apocalypse en Lilas, Capriccio (1945), acquired in 2010, 




and Mornington Crescent, Summer Morning II (2004) by Frank Auerbach, acquired in 2006.
 

The exhibition also reflects the prominence of women artists in the Ben Uri Collection since its foundation, including Clare Winsten (1894–1989), Lily Delissa Joseph (1863–1940) Amy Drucker (1873–1951), Chana Kowalska (1907–1941), Irma Stern (1894–1966), Eva Frankfurther (1930–1959), Clara Klinghoffer (1900–1970), Dorothy Bohm (1924– ) and Sophie Robertson (1988–).

Tate will make a rare loan of 






Mark Gertler’s most celebrated work, Merry-Go-Round (1916), 

his visceral reaction to the First World War. Presented to the collection of the Ben Uri Art Society, by Gertler’s dealers, the Leicester Galleries, in 1944, six years after the artist’s death, the painting was sold to the Tate in 1984, where it has remained ever since.

More images:



(MarkGertler, Rabbi and Rabbitzin, 1914, watercolour and pencil on paper, 82.5 x 71cm, Ben Uri Collection)


Torn Poster, London by Dorothy Bohm

Ben Uri Gallery and Museum began life as an Art Society founded by émigré Jews in Whitechapel’s ghetto in July 1915. It is the oldest Jewish cultural organisation in the UK. It is the only art museum in Europe whose raison d’etre is to address universal issues of identity and migration through the visual arts. Its collection of more than 1,300 works by 392 artists from 35 countries continues to grow and principally reflects the work, lives and contribution of British and European artists of Jewish descent, interpreted within the context of 20th and 21st century art history, politics and society.

Out of Chaos is co-curated by Rachel Dickson, Head of Curatorial Services, and Sarah MacDougall, Eva Frankfurther Research and Curatorial Fellow for the Study of Émigré Artists / Head of Collections at the Ben Uri Gallery. Two extensive catalogues will be published to coincide with the exhibition including texts by Shulamith Behr, Richard Cork, Rachel Dickson, David Herman, James Hyman, Tony Kushner, Sarah MacDougall, David Mazower, Kathrin Pieren and Brian Sewell. 

Gods and Heroes: Masterpieces from the École des Beaux-Arts, Paris

$
0
0

Portland Art Museum JUN 13 – SEP 13, 2015

This rich overview of masterpieces from the École des Beaux-Arts—the original school of fine arts in Paris and a repository for work by Europe’s most renowned artists since the seventeenth century—includes approximately 140 paintings, sculptures, and works on paper dating from antiquity through the nineteenth century.

The exhibition focuses on epic themes such as courage, sacrifice, and death, as well as the ways that changing political and philosophical systems affected the choice and execution of these subjects. Among the featured works are paintings by Jacques-Louis David, Jean-Honoré Fragonard, Anne-Louis Girodet, and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres; sculpture by Antoine-Louis Barye, Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux, Jean-Antoine Houdon, and François Rude; and drawings by Simon Vouet, Antoine-Jean Gros, and Théodore Géricault.

Pierre-Charles Jombert. Apollo and Diana Killing the Children of Niobe, 1772. Oil on canvas. 53 3/16 x 44 1/8 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 17). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
David d'Angers. Pain, 1811. Plaster. 26 5/8 x 12 x 10 1/4 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (TES 4). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres. Achilles Receiving the Ambassadors of Agamemnon, 1801. Oil on canvas. 44 1/2 x 57 1/2 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 40). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Jean-Honoré Fragonard. Jeroboam Sacrificing to the Idols, 1752. Oil on canvas. 43 7/8 x 56 1/2 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 7). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Jacques Phillippe Joseph de Saint Quentin. Death of Socrates, 1762. Oil on canvas. 43 7/8 x 54 1/2 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 10). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.

Achille-Etna Michallon. Democritus and Abderites, 1817. Oil on canvas. 45 1/4 x 57 1/16 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 56). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres. Torso (Painted Half-Figure), 1800. Oil on canvas. 40 3/16 x 31 1/2 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (Torse 15). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Jacques-Louis David. Erasistratus Discovers the Cause of Antiochus's Disease, 1774. Oil on canvas. 47 1/4 x 61 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 18). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
Michel-Martin Drolling. The Wrath of Achilles, 1810. Oil on canvas. 44 1/2 x 57 1/2 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (PRP 48). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.
William-Adolphe Bouguereau. Disdain, 1850. Oil on canvas. 21 5/8 x 18 1/8 inches. École des Beaux-Arts, Paris (TEP 28). Courtesy American Federation of Arts.


Gods and Heroes offers unique insight into the development of an aesthetic ideology that fostered some of western art’s most magnificent achievements. The epic deeds of gods and heroes, enshrined in the Bible and the works of Homer, were the primary narratives from which both aspiring and established academicians drew their inspiration. At the École, learning how to construct persuasive and powerful paintings from carefully delineated anatomy, expressive faces, and convincing architectural and landscape settings was understood to be the route to success and recognition. The ideology was rooted in the study of the idealized human form as envisioned in classical art. The exhibition features extraordinary works that served as models for the students, including ancient sculpture, a drawing by Raphael, and prints by Albrecht Dürer and Rembrandt van Rijn.



The exhibition is accompanied by a fully illustrated exhibition catalogue with a major essay by Guest Curator Emmanuel Schwartz, Conservateur du patrimoine/Research Curator at the École des Beaux-Arts, as well as several other major contributions.

Gods and Heroes: Masterpieces from the École des Beaux-Arts, Paris is organized by the American Federation of Arts and the École des Beaux-Arts, Paris, and host curated by Dawson Carr, Ph.D., The Janet and Richard Geary Curator of European Art.

Van Gogh: Irises and Roses at The Metropolitan Museum of Art

$
0
0

The exuberant bouquets of spring flowers that punctuate Van Gogh’s work in Provence are reunited in Van Gogh: Irises and Roses at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, through August 16, 2015. The exhibition brings together for the first time the quartet of flower paintings—two of irises, two of roses, in contrasting formats and color schemes—that Van Gogh made on the eve of his departure from the asylum at Saint-Rémy. In them, he sought to impart a “calm, unremitting ardor” to his “last stroke of the brush.” Conceived as a series or ensemble on a par with the Sunflower decoration he painted earlier in Arles, the group includes the




Metropolitan Museum’s Irises




and Roses and their counterparts:



the upright Irises from the Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam,



and the horizontal Roses from the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

The presentation is timed to accord with the blooming of the flowers that had captivated the artist’s attention, opening 125 years to the week that Van Gogh announced he was working on these “large bouquets” in letters to his brother dated May 11 and 13, 1890. It offers a revealing look at the signature still lifes in a singular context, inviting reconsideration of his artistic aims and the impact of dispersal and color fading on his intended results.

Vincent van Gogh (1853–1890) worked with steady enthusiasm on the suite of irises and roses during his last week at the asylum of Saint-Paul-de-Mausole at Saint-Rémy, where he had taken refuge since the previous May (for a condition diagnosed by his doctors as a form of epilepsy). With his release from institutional life in sight, he marked the end of his yearlong stay by painting flowers gathered from the overgrown garden he had depicted upon his arrival, bringing his work in Saint-Rémy full circle. At the same time, he extended his repertoire of still life (which had suffered neglect in the interim) with an admirable sequel to the glorious Sunflower series of Arles. 

They were made while he was packing his belongings for his move to Auvers, in the wake of an incapacitating breakdown that had robbed him of early spring—a pocket of time he likened to the calm after the storm. Completed just three days before he boarded the northbound train, on May 16, 1890, this painting campaign reflects his spirited determination to make up for lost ground, to prove he had not lost his touch, and to make the last strokes count. 

Van Gogh’s facility of execution is matched by the rigor behind this concerted undertaking. He relied on canvases corresponding in size, each composition anchored by a slightly off-center vase and unified by a common horizon line. He then engaged the power of contrast, giving full reign to the pairing of opposites (color, format, and floral motif) that would complement and enhance one another in juxtaposition. Orchestrated around two sets of complementary colors—yellow and violet, pink and green, varied for different expressive effects—the series follows the arc of the artist’s evolving sensibility as a colorist, advancing from the strident high-keyed palette he favored in Arles to the subtler, more softly modulated range of hues he came to use in Saint-Rémy.
Holding a loaded brush in one hand and the “laws of color” in his mind’s eye, Van Gogh painted the bouquets with the surefire command of an artist who had routinely teased out his originality as colorist by painting floral still lifes: from the mixed arrangements he made by the dozens in Paris to update his lackluster Dutch palette, to the pared-down, single-flower motifs he undertook in Arles that cleared the way for exploiting the rich potential of suggestive color. An artist deeply appreciative of nature, he knew that “flowers wilt quickly and it’s a matter of doing the whole thing in one go,” and he did not skimp when it came to tracing the lively arabesques of the irises’ sword–like leaves or the manifold petals of the distinctive Roses de Provence (known as the “hundred-petaled rose”).
The bouquets took shape in swift and almost seamless succession. Van Gogh paused only once, when he shifted his focus from irises to roses. It was at this juncture—after six days of silence—that he sent a progress report to his brother Theo, on May 11, 1890. Leading off with current news, he briefly mentioned “a canvas of roses” (so vaguely as to fit either version) and then backtracked from there, elaborating on the color schemes and effects of the two Irises, which he had already resolved. On May 13, he wrote Theo that he had “just finished” the second Roses.
Three days later, Van Gogh checked himself out of the asylum, bringing his Provençal sojourn to a close, having completed in a spirited bid against time, a capstone series—or coda—to his staggering achievement of a little more than two years, an enterprise he described as a “revelation of color.” Left behind to dry, the paintings were sent to him in Auvers, arriving in late June, a month before he died. They were dispersed by the following spring, and have not been seen together since. Like their group dynamic, the colors and effects he had intended are no longer intact, owing to his use of highly light-sensitive red lake pigments. In turn, the violet irises are nearly blue, the pink roses almost white. The carefully plotted color relationships (within and between the works), the integrity of various details, and the intensity of overall expression have been lost in the balance. Never has Van Gogh’s observation “paintings fade like flowers” been more compelling.

Despite these casualties—which are endemic to Van Gogh’s mature work as a whole, given his penchant for working in series and bright red lakes—the pictures were invested with enough wall power to hold their own. (The two in the Metropolitan’s collection had held a place on the walls of his mother’s house until her death in 1907; by then, the once-pink roses that had hung in her vestibule, were described as “white.”)

The Museum’s initiative in reuniting the group of four paintings has been the stimulus for new technical and documentary investigations, undertaken in close collaboration with researchers, conservators, and scientists at the lending institutions. These findings are introduced in the exhibition, which includes digital color reconstructions, based on extensive analysis and comparative study. The installation presents the paintings in the order in which they were realized, and in frames adapted from the artist’s profile but designed to be unobtrusive, so that the unfolding logic and verve of Van Gogh’s four-part painting campaign may be fully appreciated.


Exhibition Credits and Related Programs


Van Gogh: Irises and Rosesis organized by Susan Alyson Stein, Engelhard Curator of Nineteenth-Century European Painting in the Metropolitan Museum’s Department of European Paintings. Charlotte Hale, Conservator in the Department of Paintings Conservation, directed the technical research and analysis undertaken in conjunction with the project.

Maurice Prendergast: Boston Public Garden Watercolors AT THE MET

$
0
0

From 1895 to 1897, Maurice Prendergast (1858–1924) filled the pages of a folio album with drawings in watercolor, pencil, and pen and ink, sketched on-site in the Boston Public Garden. These radiant watercolors capture incidental pastimes in one of America’s famed urban parks. Once called the poet laureate of the picnic and the celebration, Prendergast ranks among the finest watercolorists of his generation. Several of the sketches originated as ideas for advertisements, while others laid out subjects for monotype printmaking. The album, later called the Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook, likely served as a presentation piece for publishers and other clients.

Maurice Prendergast: Boston Public Garden Watercolors, on view at the Metropolitan Museum through September 7, 2015, presents all 45 works from the sketchbook—watercolors and several drawings—a fitting tribute to an American artist whose colorful imagery chronicled charming pastimes in and around his beloved city.




Maurice Brazil Prendergast (American, 1858–1924). A Fountain in the Public Garden (detail) from Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook, 1895–97. Watercolor over pencil, bordered in pencil and watercolor, on paper; 14 1/8 x 11 3/16 in. (35.8 x 28.4 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 (1975.1.945) 
 
 
The Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook was purchased by Robert Lehman in 1961 from the widow of Prendergast's brother, Charles. There was evidence of deterioration from mold, and it was then decided to dismantle the album to ensure the preservation of its drawings. The superb album of drawings is the largest and most elaborate of Maurice Prendergast’s many sketchbooks.


Maurice Brazil Prendergast | Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook: The Huntington Avenue Streetcar | The Metropolitan Museum of Art



Maurice Brazil Prendergast | Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook: A mother pushing her baby in a perambulator, with her daughter at her side  



A woman passing a café, Folio 44 recto from Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook, 1895-97, watercolor over pencil on paper, 14-1/16 x 11-3/16 inches, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Robert Lehman Collection, 1975 1975.1.967 

Born in Newfoundland, Canada, Prendergast spent much of his life in Boston, where the picturesque landscapes and seascapes in and around the vibrant city provided the perfect setting for his repertoire of leisured subjects at play. Armed with portable watercolors, Prendergast could slip in and out of a beachfront crowd or a promenading family in the park unnoticed. Few artists at the turn of the last century captured so tellingly the spirit of incidental daily pastimes. The carefree recreation of cosseted children and their adoring mothers populate almost every page of the Large Boston Public Garden Sketchbook.

The Public Garden encompasses 24 acres in south central Boston. Today bounded by Boylston and Beacon streets, the parkland was once a tidal flat at the city’s edge. Together with the Boston Common, these two parks designed by George Meacham form part of a succession of green spaces that was laid out by Frederick Law Olmsted and were known as the Emerald Necklace. As the first public botanical garden in the United States, the Boston Public Garden is a marvelous legacy of Victorian landscape design, replete with fountains, statuary, flowerbeds, and majestic trees. Its pathways provided artists like Maurice Prendergast with the perfect mise-en-scène for colorful on-site sketching.



Also on view at the Metropolitan Museum this summer is Prendergast’s oil painting Central Park (1903). It is on display in the American Wing (Gallery 772) with works by the early 20th-century urban realists known as the Ashcan group and The Eight.

Maurice Prendergast: Boston Public Garden Watercolors is organized by Dita Amory, Acting Associate Curator in Charge and Administrator of the Robert Lehman Collection at The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Book :


DELAWARE ART MUSEUM PRESENTS JOHN SLOAN’S PUZZLES

$
0
0



Best known as a member of the Ashcan School, painter and illustrator John Sloan (1871-1951) often focused his paintings and prints on city life and its people during the early 20th century. However, between 1900 and 1910, Sloan produced a weekly series of word and picture puzzles for the Sunday supplement of the Philadelphia Press, one of the country’s leading illustrated newspapers.  

The Puzzling World of John Sloan–on view for the first time June 6 – September 6, 2015–explores this little-known facet of Sloan’s early newspaper career, presenting 25 works from the Museum’s collection. The puzzles demonstrate the artist’s imagination and verbal and visual wit, as well as the fluid boundaries between fine art and newspaper illustration in the first decade of the 20th century.

University of Delaware Ph.D. student Margarita Karasoulas and Delaware Art Museum Alfred Appel, Jr., Curatorial Fellow,who conducted the research for The Puzzling World of John Sloanin the Museum’s extensive Sloan archives, combed through over 100 newspaper pages featuring Sloan’s puzzle designs to curate the exhibition. The 25 complex puzzles highlighted in the exhibition include mazes, rebuses, hidden pictures, a cryptic letter, and a delictate watercolor.


The Bang-Up Puzzle, September 14, 1902. John Sloan (1871–1951). Color tearsheet, dimensions. Delaware Art Museum, Helen Farr Sloan Library and Archives, purchased from Will Shortz, 2013.


 Halloween Puzzle, October 27, 1901. John Sloan (1871–1951). Watercolor, pen and ink, graphite on paper board, 22 3/8 x 22 inches. Delaware Art Museum, Gift of Helen Farr Sloan, 1981.

“Sloan’s puzzles are deceptively simple in appearance,” Karasoulas explains, “But the puzzles are conceptually challenging, incorporating hidden words or images, pictorial puns, as well as components that require cutting, pasting, folding, or rearranging.”

 
 
Sherlock Holmes Puzzle, 1901 - John Sloan (1871–1951)
Delaware Art Museum, John Sloan Manuscript Collection, Helen Farr Sloan Library and Archives© Delaware Art Museum / Artists Rights Society (ARS), 





John Sloan, “Blackbird Puzzle” (1901), commercial printing process, 22 5/8 × 17 3/4 inches (courtesy Delaware Art Museum, John Sloan Manuscript Collection, Helen Farr Sloan Library and Archives, © Delaware Art Museum / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York) 
 
At the turn of the 20th century, puzzles commanded the attention of readers nationwide. Competing publications engaged in fierce circulation wars, luring customers with eye-catching visual effects, colored comics, and assorted games and activities. By the middle of the decade, puzzles appeared in virtually every national newspaper, and puzzles remain regular fixtures of the Sunday paper even to this day.

Must read article about these works

John Sloan Gloucester Days

$
0
0

The Cape Ann Museum  July 11, 2015 — Nov. 29, 2015

One of this country’s most important artists of the early 20th century and a highly respected teacher, John Sloan (1871-1951) spent five summers—1914 through 1918—living and working on Cape Ann. During that time he created nearly 300 finished oil paintings, using Gloucester’s rugged landscape as a backdrop to experiment with color and explore ideas about form, texture and light. Arguably the most productive period of his career, the body of work that Sloan created during this time continues to astonish and delight viewers a century after it was completed.

The Cape Ann Museum is proud to have five major works by John Sloan in its permanent collection:   


Sunflowers, Rocky Neck, 1914;




Old Cone (Uncle Sam), 1914;  




Glare on the Bay, c.1914;  




Red Warehouses at Gloucester, 1914;




and Dogtown, Ruined Blue Fences, 1916.


Approximately 30 additional works, drawn from public and private collections across the country, will also be on display.

More Gloucester images:



John Sloan: Gloucester Harbor

 


John Sloan:A Gloucester Day



John French Sloan American, 1871-1951 Breezy Day, Gloucester, Mass, 1915 Signed John Sloan (lr); inscribed Breezy Day and signed John Sloan on the reverse  




Foggy Bank, Rocky Neck - John Sloan 




JOHN SLOAN1871 - 1951
YOUNG GIRL READING, GLOUCESTER




Our Red Cottage, Gloucester - John French Sloan




Fishing Port, Gloucester - John French Sloan 





Fausto Pirandello 8 July – 6 September 2015 Estorick Collection of Modern Italian Art, London

$
0
0


www.estorickcollection.com

                                    
Fausto Pirandello (1899 – 1975) was one of the most important and influential painters working in Italy between the 1930s and the 1950s. This, the first exhibition to be devoted to his work in the UK, presents the work of a figure who was central to Italian culture during the mid-twentieth century but who is perhaps less familiar outside his native country than his famous father, the dramatist and writer Luigi Pirandello.The exhibition runs from 8 July – 6 September 2015 at the Estorick Collection of Modern Italian Art in London.

Comprisingsome 50works, the show includes many of Pirandello’s masterpieces in this complete overview spanning his entire career. Like Lucian Freud, Fausto Pirandello’s vision of reality was raw, carnal and unflinchingly objective. Among the key works on display are  Women withSalamander(1928-30), Gymnasium(c. 1934), The Staircase(1934), Drought (1936-37), WomenCombing their Hair(c. 1937), The Models(1945), Through the Spectacles(1953-54) and Bathers on theBeach(c. 1961).


1.
Composition, 1928     
Oil on canvas, 106 x 100 cm
Private collection


2.
Interior in the Morning, 1931
Oil on canvas, 178 x 151 cm
Centre Pompidou, Paris
Musée national d’art moderne / Centre de création industrielle





3.
View of the Cupolas of S. Spirito, 1932
Oil on board, 48 x 64 cm
Private collection


4.
Golden Rain, c. 1933
Oil on board, 100.5 x 130 cm
Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna, Rome


5.
Gymnasium (Athletes – Athletes in a Gymnasium), c. 1934
Oil on board, 163 x 113 cm
Private collection


6.        
Drought, 1936-37
Oil on board, 155 x 155 cm
Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna, Rome


7.
Befana in Piazza Navona, c. 1951
Oil on board, 99 x 71 cm
Private collection


8.
Bathers on the Beach (Large Bathers), c. 1961
Oil on board, 103 x 150 cm
Private collection, Rome
 

Fausto Pirandello was born in Rome in 1899 and began to devote himself to painting immediately after the First World War. His attention to unsettling details, use of diagonal compositions and uncompromising realism meant that his style was at odds with the prevailing spirit of the ‘return to order’. He became one of the leading figures associated with the important Scuola Romana during the early 1930s, rejecting the classicism typical of the Novecento group which had dominated the art of the preceding decade.

Between 1928 and 1930 Pirandello lived in Paris, where his work underwent a decisive change following his contact with the ‘Italiens de Paris’, and his imagery began to acquire an almost surreal character, despite its focus on harsh reality and use of a technique informed by the heavy textures of Cubist painting.

Returningto Romein early 1931 Pirandello adopted a resolutely personal artistic approach, creating enigmatic compositions which are remarkable for their spatial ambiguity, lack of readily identifiable meanings and sense of existentialdrama, free from anynarrative elements.

During the post-war yearsPirandellocontinued along hisindependent course, keeping his distance from the maintrends and groups that emerged inItaly at the time. Between the late1940sand the early1950shedeveloped a new style grounded in the use of broken, agitated planesandelliptic, expressionistic geometry.

From the 1920s onward Pirandello participated in all of themost importantItalianexhibitions, such as the Venice Biennale and the Rome Quadriennale, and his work was also included in many international shows.He was a constant voice inItaly’s cultural debate, espousing a consistently modern andinternational outlook.

The exhibition has been curated byFabioBenzi andorganisedby the Estorick Collection in collaborationwith the Fondazione FaustoPirandello; the catalogue will include essays by the curator as well as FrancescoLeoneandFlavia Matitti, a member of the Associazione Fausto Pirandello, which has kindly supported the exhibition.


About the Estorick Collection
The Estorick Collection of Modern Italian Art is internationally renowned for its core of Futurist works. It comprises some 120 paintings, drawings, watercolours, prints and sculptures by many of the most prominent Italian artists of the Modernist era. There are six galleries, two of which are used for temporary exhibitions. Since opening in 1998, the Estorick has established a reputation and gained critical acclaim as a key venue for bringing Italian art to the British public.
Viewing all 2913 articles
Browse latest View live